Para los aerotranstornados...

Juan Xixon

Arrancando
Registrado
23 Ago 2009
Mensajes
0
Puntos
0
Ubicación
Gijón (Asturias)
Son algunas de las conclusiones de la investigación del accidente aéreo de un avión comercial de Helios.

En resumidas cuentas lo que dice es que el copiloto tenía poquísima experiencia, además no se entendía bien con el piloto ya que no hablaban el mismo idioma.

El piloto tras sonar varias alarmas lo único que quería era desconectarlas haciendo caso omiso al porque de su señal.

Avión mal mantenido... :P

Os lo copio y pego, está en inglés.

Un saludo!

Juan Pedro


Paris -- The crew members of a Cypriot Helios Airways airliners that crashed Aug. 14 near Athens became confused by a series of alarms as the plane climbed, failing to recognize that the cabin was not pressurizing until they grew mentally disoriented because of lack of oxygen and passed out, according to several people connected with the investigation.

Complicating the cockpit confusion, neither the German pilot nor the young, inexperienced Cypriot co-pilot could speak the same language fluently, and each had difficulty understanding how the other spoke English, the worldwide language of air traffic control. A total of 121 people were killed in the crash after the plane climbed and flew on autopilot, circling near Athens as it was programmed to do until one engine stopped running because of lack of fuel. The sudd imbalance of power, with only one engine operating, caused the autopilot to disengage and the plane to begin its final descent. The Greek authorities have made cryptic statements hinting the oxygen problems but have so far not announced the full findings of the investigators. The people interviewed for this article agreed to do so on condition that they not be identified because none are official spokesmen for the investigation and because of political sensitivities arising from a Cypriot plane crashing in Greece.

Investigators pieced together the story of the crash from numerous sources. In the wreckage, they found the first solid clues, the pressurization valve and an air outflow valve set incorrectly. Air traffic control tapes provided information on the confusion in the cockpit. The plane had a sophisticated new flight data recorder that provided a wealth of information. There were maintenance records from the night before, and investigators interviewed the mechanics who worked on the plane. Among other things, the investigators determined that the pilot was not in his seat because he was up trying to solve a problem that turned out to be not the greatest facing him. The plane that crashed, a Boeing 737-300, underwent maintenance the night before. The maintenance crew apparently left a pressurization controller rotary knob out of place, according to the officials connected to the investigation, and the crew did not catch the mistake during preflight checks the next day. This meant that the plane could not pressurize. At 10,000 feet, or 3,000 meters, as designed, and alarm went off to warn the crew that the plane would not pressurize. However, the crew members mistakenly thought that the alarm horn was a warning to tell them that their controls were not set properly for take off, the officials said.

The same horn is used for both conditions, although it will sound for take off configuration only while the plane is still on the ground. The crew continued the climb on autopilot. At 14,000 feet, oxygen masks deployed as designed and a master caution light illuminated in the cockpit. Another alarm sounded at about the same time on an unrelated matter, warning that there was insufficient cooling air in the compartment housing avionics equipment. The radio tapes showed that this created tremendous confusion in the cockpit. Normally an aircraft cabin is held at 8,000 feet pressure, so the crew at over 14,000 feet would already be experiencing some disorientation because of a lack of oxygen. During this time, the German captain and the Cypriot co-pilot discovered they had no common language and that their English, while good enough for normal air traffic control purposes, was not good enough for complicated technical conversation in fixing the problem. The crew members called the maintenance base in Cyprus and were told that the circuit breaker to turn off the loud new alarm was in a cabinet behind the captain.

The captain got up from his seat to look for the circuit breaker, apparently ignoring the confused co-pilot. As the plane continued to climb on autopilot, the air grew so thin that the crew became seriously impaired. The captain passed out first on the floor of the cockpit, followed by the co-pilot, who remained in his seat, according to the officials. The autopilot did as it was programmed to do, flying the plane at 34,000 feet to Athens and entering a holding pattern. It remained in a long circling pattern, shadowed by Greek military jets, until fuel ran low and one engine quit.

Boeing, the maker of the plane, issued a notice shortly after the crash to airlines that it would revise flight crew training manuals to stress to crews that they must understand how the various warning systems work and what to do about them. The notice stresses that the take off configuration warning horn will not sound under any circumstances after the plane has left the ground. The same horn will then be used only for a cabin altitude warning. The company notice said there had been other instances of confusion over the horn by pilots. "Confusion between the cabin altitude warning horn and the take off configuration warning horn can be resolved if the crew remembers that the take off configuration warning horn is only armed when the airplane is on the ground" the notice said. "If this horn is activated in flight, it indicates that the cabin altitude has reached 10,000 feet".
 
Una de las cagadas más grandes que he visto por parte de los pilotos :P.

Si las alarmas se dispararon, como es posible que el avión continuase su ascenso y los pilotos no hicieran uso de las máscaras?
 
Vsssssssssssssssssss,

Soy "piloto" a nivel muy-muy-muy aficionado, de hecho solo he estado a los mandos de ultraligeros. Pero llego a saber que toda alarma tiene su protocolo de actuación, primero para comprobarla y posteriormente para actuar segun se confirme o no.

La triste realidad es que estamos en manos de profesionales que siendolo lo son cada dia menos, algo parecido a lo que ocurre con la Marina Mercante. Las compañías presionan para flexibilizar las normas de acceso a las diferentes categorías alegando que se dispone de asistencias automatizadas que permiten obviar la experiencia, horas de vuelo como segundo en aviones de igual clase, a los comandantes. Formandose tripulaciones muy a la ligera. Lo que de verdad se busca es tener un amplio abanico de posibles pilotos que permita reducir por competencia el coste de sus salarios.

Igual ocurre en el mundo de los mecánicos de vuelo y las revisiones de los equipos.

Asi nos va, pero no teniendo alternativa para el avión en desplazamientos de envergadura me temo que nos va a seguir asi.

Vsssssssssssssssssssssss.
 
Atrás
Arriba